Debat Lintas Agama di YouTube sebagai Ruang Pembelajaran Agama Informal: Transformasi Otoritas Pendidikan Agama Islam di Era Digital
Keywords:
interfaith debate, informal religious learning, islamic religious education, digital religious authority, youtubeAbstract
This study examines interfaith debate on YouTube as a form of informal religious learning and its implications for the transformation of Islamic religious education authority in the digital era. While Islamic religious education has traditionally been situated in formal institutions such as schools, madrasahs, and pesantren, digital platforms increasingly shape religious learning beyond formal pedagogical structures. This study analyzes how Muslim audiences engage with interfaith debate content, how learning experiences emerge, and how religious authority is negotiated in platform-mediated environments. This research employed an exploratory qualitative design combining digital observation, qualitative content analysis, and semi-structured interviews. Data were collected from 50 interfaith debate videos on YouTube, approximately 420 purposively selected audience comments, and interviews with 20 active Muslim viewers. Data were analyzed thematically using NVivo 14. The findings indicate that YouTube functions not only as a space for religious polemics but also as a potential informal learning environment where audiences compare arguments, seek clarification, reflect on beliefs, and independently explore religious issues. Perceptions of religious authority are increasingly negotiated through scholarly legitimacy, communicative performance, digital social validation, and algorithmic visibility. However, this pedagogical potential is ambivalent, as opportunities for reflective learning coexist with risks of confirmation bias, polarization, and performative religious consumption. The study concludes that Islamic religious education should expand its pedagogical orientation by strengthening digital religious literacy, ethical dialogue, and critical evaluation of religious authority in digital environments.
References
V. J. Marsick and K. E. Watkins, Informal and Incidental Learning in the Workplace. London, U.K.: Routledge, 1990.
V. J. Marsick and K. E. Watkins, “Informal and incidental learning,” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, no. 89, pp. 25–34, 2001. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ace.5
D. W. Livingstone, “Adults’ informal learning: Definitions, findings, gaps and future research,” NALL Working Paper No. 21, Toronto, Canada, 2001.
M. Eraut, “Informal learning in the workplace,” Studies in Continuing Education, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 247–273, 2004. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/158037042000225245
H. A. Campbell, Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2013.
H. A. Campbell and R. Tsuria, Eds., Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in Digital Media, 2nd ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2021.
G. R. Bunt, Hashtag Islam: How Cyber-Islamic Environments Are Transforming Religious Authority. Chapel Hill, NC, USA: University of North Carolina Press, 2018.
G. Evolvi, Blogging My Religion: Secular, Muslim, and Catholic Media Spaces in Europe. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2020.
S. M. Hoover, Religion in the Media Age. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2006.
H. A. Campbell, “Understanding the relationship between religion online and offline in a networked society,” Journal of the American Academy of Religion, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 64–93, 2012. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfr074
M. Lövheim and G. Lynch, “The mediatization of religion debate,” Culture and Religion, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111–117, 2011. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14755610.2011.579730
T. Gillespie, “The relevance of algorithms,” in Media Technologies: Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society, T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, and K. A. Foot, Eds. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2014, pp. 167–194.
T. Bucher, If...Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2018.
K. Cotter, “Playing the visibility game: How digital influencers and algorithms negotiate influence on Instagram,” New Media & Society, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 895–913, 2019. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461444818815684
R. S. Nickerson, “Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises,” Review of General Psychology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 175–220, 1998. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
N. Selwyn, Education and Technology: Key Issues and Debates, 2nd ed. London, U.K.: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
H. Jenkins, R. Purushotma, M. Weigel, K. Clinton, and A. J. Robison, Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press, 2009.
H. A. Campbell and W. Bellar, Digital Religion: The Basics. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2023.
H. A. Campbell, Ed., Digital Creatives and the Rethinking of Religious Authority. London, U.K.: Routledge, 2021.
T. Gillespie, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions That Shape Social Media. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 2018.
J. van Dijck, T. Poell, and M. de Waal, The Platform Society: Public Values in a Connective World. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press, 2018.
N. Couldry and U. A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism. Stanford, CA, USA: Stanford University Press, 2019.
C. R. Sunstein, #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, NJ, USA: Princeton University Press, 2017.
Z. Tufekci, Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale University Press, 2017.
R. Hobbs, Digital and Media Literacy: Connecting Culture and Classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Corwin Press, 2011.
B. E. Rusadi and S. Aripin, “Religious digital literacy of Islamic education students at Indonesia State Islamic University,” Tadris: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–19, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.19105/tjpi.v18i1.8305
A. Reksiana, D. Nata, D. Rosyada, M. D. H. Rahiem, and A. R. Rafikjon Ugli, “Digital extension of digital literacy competence for Islamic religious education teachers in the era of digital learning,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 402–420, 2024. https://dx.doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v21i2.9719
Hamdi and Jumrodah, “Development of e-modules in increasing digital literacy in Islamic religious education subjects: An effort to support the implementation of the Kurikulum Merdeka,” Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 74–89, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2023.vol8(1).11953
E. Lisyawati, Mohsen, U. Hidayati, and O. A. Taufik, “Literasi digital pembelajaran pendidikan agama Islam pada MA Nurul Qur’an Bogor,” EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama dan Keagamaan, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 209–226, 2023. https://dx.doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v21i2.1618
Z. A. Barocky and F. Zahrah, “Literasi digital dalam pembelajaran akidah akhlak di era Society 5.0: Analisis pustaka tematik,” Al-Adabiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 145–160, 2024.
Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, Moderasi Beragama. Jakarta, Indonesia: Badan Litbang dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI, 2019.
A. Azra, Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan Modernisasi Menuju Milenium Baru. Jakarta, Indonesia: Logos Wacana Ilmu, 1999.
G. Evolvi, “Religion and the internet: Digital religion, (mis)information, and new forms of authority,” Religions, vol. 12, no. 9, Art. no. 717, 2021. https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rel12090717
H. A. Campbell, “Constructing religious authority in online spaces,” in Digital Religion: Understanding Religious Practice in New Media Worlds, H. A. Campbell, Ed. New York, NY, USA: Routledge, 2013, pp. 64–79.
J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.
R. Kozinets, Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research, 3rd ed. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2020.
S. Pink, H. Horst, J. Postill, L. Hjorth, T. Lewis, and J. Tacchi, Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2016.
H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, “Three approaches to qualitative content analysis,” Qualitative Health Research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277–1288, 2005. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687
M. Schreier, Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2012.
M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2015.
G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability,” Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–82, 2006. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101, 2006. https://dx.doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
V. Braun and V. Clarke, Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. London, U.K.: SAGE Publications, 2022.
Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 1985.
L. S. Nowell, J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules, “Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria,” International Journal of Qualitative Methods, vol. 16, no. 1, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
A. Markham and E. Buchanan, “Ethical decision-making and internet research: Recommendations from the AoIR ethics working committee,” Association of Internet Researchers, 2012.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ona Yulita, Rizki Hariandi, Diana Sari, Amir Syarifuddin, Supriadi, Umar Manshur, Mona Novita (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
